"Wis. Democrats demand UW tuition freeze" by Latest News -- GazetteXtra

"Wis. Democrats demand UW tuition freeze" by Latest News -- GazetteXtra

Point-Counterpoint: Bear Trader and Bro Debate Economic Mess

from my brother C: IMO, the fundamental mistake that the 'economic theorist collective' has been making lies in a Keysnian system that only works when huge amounts of idle manufacturing capacity exists within a nation. The idea of increased demand works when more people are hired with a given country (EU is not a nation) and factories there reopen, increased wages are pumped back into the economy etc. When 40% of the economy is 'financial' and, maybe, 50% of the average person's domestic needs are being provided by Chinese factories, all printing money does is increase employment in Chinese factories. Both the UK and the US had a large industrial base that provided consumer items for the British Realm, and, the huge US consumer market, respectively, in the 1930s which would respond to federally triggered increases in domestic demand. In addition, I suspect, that the use of stategic tariffs, principly to protect domestic low ticket consumer item manufacturing, would respond to a nation 'pumping up the money' (Britain in the 1930s). I believe that much of the "Walmuck Sector" domestic manufacturing has been effectively destroyed by direct outsourcing and by retailers bypassing US manufacturers completely and dealing directly with manufacturers overseas. As I repeatedly tell those who will listen, an increase in sales of 10% in Walmuck US sales (less true in their food retailing) might add .1% to the net employment monies pumped into the economy by all US employees, and, add 1 or so percent to the Chinese manufacturing employment rate. 20 -25% of Walmuck employees receive food stamps). This gutting of US domestic low ticket consumer item manufacturing extends up the food chain, with the least erosion of market share in the almost handmade high ticket items, such as commercial aircraft, movies, and, weapon systems.. Unfortunately, these sectors, IMO, do not respond to printing money well, as the reduction in net consumer discretionary income reduces air travel, encourages at home media entertainment, and, the lowering tax receipt problem that triggered printing money in the first place, reduces monies spent on future weapons platforms, etc. I am struck by how off base almost all the arguments about what is happening to the US economy appear to be. Most people I talk to attribute problems to a sector of the total economy. Manyt of my aquaintances consider the problem to be the 'Wall Street White Shoes Gang', and, if I were to have to blame one sector for our current problems, I would agree. A far smaller, largely economically successful group, blames the federal government for regulations, laws, etc., for creating the environment where business was forced to outsource, etc. Another group, principly blue collar and often unemployeed, blames the decline on the non-whites who leech federal and state monies while getting preferential job treatment. A tiny group, which I do not have the opportunity to co-mingle with, believes that they (or their relatives) acquired their great asset base through skill, and, that the masses need to be disciplined. This group has disportionate power and no visibility. Lastly, I know a smattering of a very large group of tenured government employees in education, the military, and, various departments who, due to having job security, can have a active social agenda. As employees paid by levied taxes, the group, by definition is socialist, with the only caveate being that their conservatism is applied to those outside their group. Yup, as you inferred, the problem concerns us all, which reminds me of a thought I have been having a lot lately: "The last person under the bridge gets the worst spot." (Those that don't have enough paid for assets, etc., someday will have to compete with the long term poor on equal footing...) -C My reply -- Some thoughts - "Economic Theorist Collective" indeed. Morey McDonald, old acquaintance (Econ PhD, works in Academia), very decent guy, certainly intelligent enough, back in 2008 heard me out on my "the Emperor has no clothes" arguments. At the time the "economic theorist collective" was deeply shaken by the obviously hopelessly flawed models they had been using and more tolerant of skepticism. I pointed out that the economic crash of 2007 - 2008 had not only been widely predicted but that I could see it coming clearly enough to get out of the markets in August 2007. If the economic - econometric models couldn't predict the events of 2007 and 2008, I told him, then they obviously didn't have the relevant independent variables (same thing that is wrong with the Anthropogenic Global Warming models). I had been doing spreadsheet models at GM for some years that were Important (I could have been fired if the models didn't "work"). The most important thing about models is that the math blows up if you try to extrapolate the model into the future (essentially "divide by zero"); you have to use calculus and differential equations to handle this, but if you don't have the relevant independent variables baked into the pie instead of a working model you get a simple "curve fit", a "model" that simply identifies one of many possible "trend lines" carried forward into the future, essentially a statement that the future will recapitulate the past. Physicists long ago started making models with reasonably adequate independent variables, Isaac Newton being the most notable of the Ancients. The Economists have a screaming nutcase case of model envy here, they want their theories respected like physics models are. But they don't seem to know how to do this, they don't even see how ridiculously goofy the stuff they publish is, or how to get out the stupid hole they have dug for themselves, so I told Morey what they were doing wrong and how to get it right. He listened all the way through, almost an hour. Interestingly he increasingly works in areas where the models are better (not so swelled headed, Krugmanesque). Like I said, a good man. You point out that "all printing money does is increase employment in Chinese factories". That doesn't bother the Politburo a bit, but the dollar caused inflation does, notice the great political pressure to control food prices and apartment prices. The Chinese, to an extent, are importing inflation from the USA. "Bernankeism" is aimed at China more than the USA, although critical mass has been exceeded already in real estate - another bubble is strongly under weigh and will inevitably explode there - and real US inflation is not 2% but 6.5% - Pensions are blowing up, as are insurance companies (for the same reason) because of the very destructive over 5% negative real interest rates. Free money is not free, someone has to pay for it, and the guy who pays, by definition, is the little guy. You know, if you can't see who the sucker is at the poker table the sucker is you. As far as Walmart is concerned, they don't bother me any, they and their ilk are just an opportunistic infection, if you leave money around in great big piles, or tons of illegal drugs, or gang territories, some people will see the opportunity an take it. Such things are simply caused by mismanagement. The Feds have taken onto themselves the management of all such stuff, from Bernanke to foreign trade, so therefore the Feds are responsible for all of this - not Walmart. You want some simple stuff that will work? 1. An import tariff designed to raise Federal income (an"income tariff") of 5% on all imports, repeat ALL. Since we have so many layers of financial middle men getting a cut on imports these days, the 5% tariff is not on the cost of the overseas shipment but instead of the retail cost of the good when sold to the final user. 2.Get rid of Dodd - Frank. Chris Dodd was the Senator most in bed with the Big Banks. Dodd - Frank is set up to "prevent" another crash (hardy, har, har) while making sure The Too Big to Fail could get bigger, richer, more stupid, etc. You want to fix this, Glass - Steagall worked perfectly for sixty years until Clinton's Sec Treas Robert Rubin got Glass - Steagall repealed. Rubin was a Big Bank man to the core, ex CEO of Goldman Sachs. Clinton signed the repeal. I don't know what he got out of it, but more than $50 Million anyway. (Clinton got most of his money from the Chinese for selling them anything they asked for, including how to make ICBMs work, how to make American quality air-to-air and ground-to-air missles including declaring whole factories working full time producing these weapons "surplus" and selling them to the Chinese as well as the complete specs and prints of the W series missile nuclear warheads - state of the art stuff. (Ron Brown was involved in this stuff deeply and threatened to squeal if the Clintons didn't protect him from the Justice Department. Brown and a whole planeload of other people died by accident, of course.) These are real big changes. Glass - Steagall would break up the Big Banks. The Tariff would shift income from imports to domestic production, causing lots of mad Big Boys. Repeal Dodd - Frank. Reinstate Glass - steagall. 5% import tariff (Small tariffs work better than large. Besides you can always threaten to raise it in the future.) 3. These two things will cause a lot of bankruptcies. Get set up for this. Write off bad assets thoroughly. 4. Stop the Fed "quantitative easing". This is pure money printing. No more Fed buying Treasuries, no more buying Federal Mortgage Backed Securities. This will pop the Real Estate Bubble before it gets disastrously large. This will force the Treasury to pay market interest to issue government paper. (The Federal Reserve is buying more than 60% of new Federal Notes and Bonds.) This will force the various big spending factions in the US Government to eat shit. Breakfast of champions. Remember that Government is not productive but only consumes. The Government is overhead, not production. 5 Market interest rates are needed. Fed Funds rates should be raised to higher than actual consumer inflation, currently 6.5%. This one is dangerous. The current situation is like being surrounded by attackers while in your house, attackers who will shoot you dead if they can, and your house is burning. A delicate situation. - P

Mailbag: Bear Trader writes; Is the Government all knowing or helpless?

I am starting to see patterns in stocks and bonds markets again. Markets are way different than 1995 - 2000 or 2002 - 2007. Those two markets were way different from each other and from now. The biggest thing lately is the developing fear that the money printing and deficit spending are not going to work like we were promised they would back in Econ 101. The country is getting poorer fast and the the government seems helpless to fix it. My own understanding of this matter is the government is, indeed, helpless to fix things, and, even worse, government attempts to fix things by "investment" confuse spending money with investment. You cannot spend your way to riches. Neither can you borrow your way to prosperity. People talk about "take off speed". Ain't gonna happen until the existing bad debt is written off. This means the end of the "too big to fail" enterprises, the network of derivatives binding the Big Boys into one house of cards, etc. Somebody will have to take the losses, there is no other way than "wealth destruction". Right now that means the public takes the loss, and, though the process is running very slowly because of government action, we see the results everywhere. "The Rich" don't have anything like the wealth to take the fall by themselves either. The bad debt in the USA alone is about ten times the GDP. It has to be written off, this means "entitlements". Those on the dole will be kicked off, no choice, pal. Politician's promises like "free" health care, social security, etc. will fail big, because there simply is not enough wealth to pay off the promises. Right now the insurance industry is hopelessly insolvent, living on accounting that ignores the real situation (with government blessing). Is it any wonder that people who see this, and there are many, are trying hard to plan ahead and execute their plans in the hope of protecting their families? The really rich, those 5% of the US households who own 92% of US assets (same as 92% of private net worth) have been definitely expecting confiscation, but you know, not right this minute, maybe soon, but got it "under control"; Cypress was quite a shock for them. So you see the current market behavior, reflex move to defensive patterns, concern over probable loss of British offshore "tax havens" (Parliament is now arguing about outlawing corporations with anonymous stockholders and anonymous trusts; this would kill the currently easiest money shelters, Cook Islands, British Virgin Islands, Bermuda, leaving Andorra, Liechtenstein, and I don't know where else). It looks to me that the government does not understand money and hasn't for many years. A result of this is that those people cannot distinguish between wealth and displays of wealth, between wealth and acting like a drunken sailor with money in his wallet. Or like a politician trying to buy votes.

Mailbag: Bear Trader writes on the Market

S&P Mar 1 to Mar 15 rose on declining volume. Mar 18 - present declining days have been on higher volume. Breadth has bin decreasing, NYSE McClellan summation index has been dropping since Feb 1, dramatically for the last three or four days. This works similarly to the Weekly A-D Line but (I think) better. NASDAQ McClellan is doing worse than NYSE. Notice the relatively strong Consumer Staples and Utilities sectors. These are traditional defensive stocks. Some movement into Federal bonds also. I think that the idea that the market is overbought is spreading. Looks like the $USD may be topping. $USD is the short term controller of Global investing. Not only Energy but Industrial and Materials sectors are quite weak. This is a sign that the "actual" economy - as opposed to the "financial" economy - is not improving. This is caused by the Federal Reserve and by US Govt. deficit (and excessive) spending. These operations are suffocating the actual economy. (This is why there are no $17 per hour jobs.) At the same time a class of very rich has been created; currently 5% of the people in the USA own 92% of the assets. When you get pissed off remember that those at fault are not the Koch Brothers but the US Government.